“Tell us again.”
Customer concerns are re-entered, shortened, or separated from the asset history.
FOR OEM WARRANTY LEADERS
Connect the entire warranty lifecycle. Turn every outcome into a better next decision.
Circuitry.ai connects customer concerns, diagnostics, coverage, and claims—so dealers, OEMs, suppliers, and customers move forward with the same context.
Answer • Decide • Act.

Concern → Repair → Claim → Learning
Lower warranty costsPrevent avoidable cost at its source
A stronger dealer networkFewer handoffs, disputes, and resubmissions
A better customer experienceFaster resolution. Greater confidence.
THE COST OF DISCONNECTION
Your systems hold valuable records. The friction appears between them: a symptom loses context, a diagnostic result never reaches the claim, or a quality finding never reaches the next technician.
Customer concerns are re-entered, shortened, or separated from the asset history.
Repair recommendations and policy decisions are made from different versions of the case.
Missing narratives and mismatched parts or labor trigger rework, delay, and disagreement.
Return inspections and engineering corrections stay downstream of the next decision.
Every disconnected handoff adds effort. Every connected decision creates an opportunity to prevent it.
THE CONNECTED FUTURE
Circuitry.ai connects the evidence behind the transaction to the decision that moves it forward. Existing platforms continue to manage their records and transactions.
Service Data Fabric + Knowledge Graph
Target architecture, configured to your environment. Available interfaces, data permissions, system capabilities, and OEM policies determine each connection and authorized action.
THE WARRANTY LIFECYCLE, CONNECTED
Explore how inputs become evidence, models become decisions, and specialized AI Workers turn decisions into coordinated action.
Symptoms lose meaning as calls, emails, and dealer notes move between systems.
Customer descriptions, conversations, photos, VIN or serial number, service history, and connected-equipment signals when available.
Language and document understanding structure symptoms, link the right asset and history, and identify missing information.
Create a shared service context, ask focused follow-up questions, and route the case with the original evidence attached.
Less repetition for customers. Better diagnostic starting points for dealers.
Track intake completeness and repeat information requests.Technicians search separate tools and may replace parts without enough evidence of the cause.
Diagnostic trouble codes, test results, operating conditions, service bulletins, repair history, and IoT or telematics data where accessible.
Knowledge retrieval and diagnostic reasoning combine approved procedures with similar repair patterns to suggest the next test and evidence needed.
Guide the technician, verify the applicable procedure and part, and carry test results into the coverage and claim record.
Better first-time fix. Fewer unnecessary replacements and No Trouble Found returns.
Track first-time fix, repeat repairs, and No Trouble Found rates.Policy interpretation happens late, triggering disputed repairs, approval delays, and avoidable dealer calls.
Warranty terms, in-service date, mileage or operating hours, asset configuration, maintenance history, campaigns, and diagnosed failure.
Policy-grounded reasoning and eligibility checks evaluate the relevant terms, limits, exclusions, and supporting evidence.
Explain the applicable coverage with source references; request missing facts and route ambiguous cases or goodwill exceptions to an authorized reviewer.
Clearer repair expectations. Fewer coverage disputes and less back-and-forth.
Track coverage turnaround, overrides, and dispute frequency.Dealers re-enter repair orders, while incomplete complaint, cause, and correction narratives cause claims to bounce back.
Repair orders, technician notes, labor operations, parts, photos, time records, and the approved repair scope.
Document extraction, multimodal analysis, and consistency checks structure the evidence and compare the actual repair with the authorization.
Prepare the claim, identify evidence gaps before submission, and preserve links to the original repair order and diagnostic history.
Cleaner submissions. Less dealer administration and fewer returned claims.
Track clean-claim rate, submission time, and resubmissions.Reviewers chase documents across systems and apply inconsistent judgments to similar claims.
Claim lines, coverage rationale, diagnosis, repair evidence, labor and parts references, prior claims, and final repair order.
Claim scoring, anomaly detection, repair-profile comparisons, and amount validation assess risk and identify exceptions.
Recommend the decision, route exceptions, and execute approved adjudication and payment instructions through connected systems, with confirmation and an audit trail.
Faster, more consistent settlement. Less leakage and fewer avoidable escalations.
Track decision quality, cycle time, automation, and payment exceptions.Blanket return requests and incomplete failure evidence create handling costs and recovery disagreements.
Failed-part identity, supplier and lot data when available, claim evidence, return policies, inspection results, and applicable recovery terms.
Risk prioritization and evidence matching help identify useful returns, reconcile findings, and assemble supported recovery recommendations.
In the target connected journey, initiate approved returns, link inspection outcomes to the original case, and prepare recovery evidence for supplier review.
More purposeful parts returns. Stronger recovery submissions and fewer unsupported disputes.
Track return cost, recovery yield, and supplier dispute rates.Claim trends arrive after costs have grown, and engineering findings rarely reach the next technician in time.
Claim outcomes, repeat repairs, rejected recommendations, dealer corrections, inspection results, and engineering-confirmed causes.
Pattern detection, cohort analysis, forecasting, and root-cause hypotheses identify emerging issues and candidate improvements.
Route emerging signals to quality and engineering; validate corrections, update approved knowledge, and measure whether the next decisions improve.
Earlier intervention. Shorter detection-to-correction cycles and a stronger customer experience.
Track issue-detection lead time, recurrence, and cost per unit in service.This is the target connected journey. Scope, AI Workers, integrations, validation, and automation levels are agreed and delivered in stages.
SELF-CORRECTING, WITH OEM CONTROL
A paid claim is only part of the outcome. Did the repair solve the concern? Did the returned part confirm the diagnosis? Did the correction prevent recurrence?
In the target ecosystem, Circuitry.ai brings those signals back to the point of decision. Your experts validate what changed; the approved improvement becomes available to the next technician, reviewer, or AI Worker.
Learning is governed. Feedback informs reviewed updates to knowledge, decision models, and orchestration. Policy changes and expanded decision authority remain under OEM approval.
CLOSED-LOOP IMPROVEMENT
Repair outcomes, overrides, returns, and recurrence
Find patterns and propose a correction
Deploy approved updates and monitor performance
Expert review, historical evaluation, and release gates
A pattern of repeat claims and No Trouble Found returns prompts investigation. Engineering confirms a connector issue. After validation, updated guidance asks technicians to check the connector before replacing the sensor. Claim review then checks for that diagnostic evidence, and analysts monitor recurrence.
FROM INTEGRATION TO INTELLIGENCE
Traditional integrations can move records without preserving the reasoning behind them. A connected decision layer adds context, feedback, and configurable intelligence across the journey.
| What changes | Fragmented, rule-heavy operations | Circuitry.ai connected future state |
|---|---|---|
| Case context | Teams reconstruct the story across separate records. | Asset, concern, diagnosis, policy, and claim evidence stay linked. |
| Decision updates | New scenarios often require code changes, tickets, and release cycles. | Approved knowledge, decision configuration, and model updates adapt guidance with less custom coding. |
| Exception handling | Emails and manual queues separate the exception from its evidence. | AI Workers carry context to the right reviewer and resume authorized work after resolution. |
| Learning from outcomes | Corrections stay in notes, reports, or individual expertise. | Validated feedback improves shared guidance and decision performance. |
| Execution | People bridge gaps between approval, repair, claims, and settlement. | Orchestrated journeys coordinate approved actions and verify system responses. |
| Management insight | Reports describe costs after they occur. | AI Analysts identify emerging patterns and recommend where to intervene. |
Integration engineering, security review, data mapping, and testing still matter. AI reduces repetitive coding and operational rework as the configured ecosystem matures.
A PRACTICAL PATH TO THE FUTURE STATE
Choose a product family, dealer group, or claim type with a measurable problem. Expand when the evidence supports it.
Connect priority data and approved knowledge. Introduce Warranty and Service Advisors alongside existing work.
Add claim intake, evidence validation, and scoring. Compare AI recommendations with expert decisions.
Automate eligible paths across claims and related systems. Route exceptions with full context.
Connect return findings, supplier recovery, quality signals, and validated learning across more programs.
A roadmap shaped by your data, your dealer network, and your decision priorities.
Map your first stageWHY CIRCUITRY.AI
Purpose-built AI Advisors, Analysts, and Agents bring domain understanding to the decisions that shape warranty performance.
Connect complaint, cause, and correction with coverage terms, labor operations, parts, dealer practices, return findings, and supplier evidence.
Explore Warranty Decision Intelligence ↗Ground decisions in approved evidence, evaluate them against expert outcomes, and expand automation within clear confidence and authority limits.
Explore Claim Scoring Agent ↗Link decision performance to avoidable claim cost, dealer effort, customer resolution, product quality, and realized supplier recovery.
Explore Claims Intelligence ↗YOUR OEM VALUE SCORECARD
Establish a baseline, compare similar product and dealer cohorts, and account for volume, mix, and seasonality.
Set targets for your program. Quantify net value after platform, integration, and change costs; avoid counting the same saving twice.
SEE YOUR CONNECTED FUTURE
Request a demo of Circuitry.ai’s Warranty Decision Intelligence and explore a staged path from your current systems to a connected, self-correcting warranty ecosystem.
Built for enterprise control
Human oversightData segregationDecision auditabilityVisit the Trust Center ↗Tell us where you want to improve.
QUESTIONS OEM LEADERS ASK
The proposed approach adds a decision layer across existing systems. Those systems retain their transactional roles. The deployment defines where Circuitry.ai reads context, recommends actions, and performs authorized updates.
No. Start with accessible policies, repair orders, claims, and service knowledge. Diagnostic feeds and IoT or telematics can enrich decisions as access, data quality, and the use case justify them.
It means connecting real outcomes to a governed improvement cycle. AI helps surface gaps and propose changes. Experts validate them, approved updates are released, and performance is monitored. It does not mean allowing AI to rewrite warranty policy or expand its own approval authority.
Configure authority limits, evidence requirements, and escalation thresholds for your program. Claims outside those limits go to the appropriate expert with the available evidence and decision rationale.
Yes. Begin with a bounded decision or journey, establish quality and value measures, and expand into additional systems and workflow stages after the agreed gates are met.